Engaging Your Class with Student Response Systems

Date: October 26, 2015

Time: 2:00pm - 3:30pm

Location: 1-231 CST

Register Here!


Learn about different ways to integrate technology to engage students in the classroom! Student response systems can add an interactive element to your class, giving you and students multiple opportunities to check for understanding. This session will highlight different types of student response systems, including TurningPoint, Poll Everywhere, and Kahoot.

Event Post Template

Date: October 9, 2015

Time: 10:30am - 12:00pm

Location: 046 ETC

Register Here!


Enter the description for the event. This can be the same description used to create the event registration in Event Espresso.

Technology of the Month

What is Office Mix?

Office Mix is a Microsoft add-in for PowerPoint that allows you to write over your PowerPoint presentations, record audio and video to place over presentations, and embed quizzes into your presentations. Office Mix only works with Microsoft Office 2013, but can be used on your tablet as well as on your computer.

How can I use Office Mix?

While writing over a PowerPoint presentation is a bit easier when using a tablet, it is convenient that you do not need a tablet in order to use the Office Mix add-in. On either type of device, just load your PowerPoint presentation, record audio and video (you can record just your audio if you’d rather not have your face in your presentations), and write and draw directly in your presentation.

When embedding quiz questions, you have the option to add feedback per question. This way, if students selected an incorrect answer you can help guide them in the right direction. Students are also able to see the results of each question they answered right after they have answered it.

When you’re finished, you can publish your finished product as an .mp4, or you can publish the video online. If published online, your video is private by default. You can choose who you share it with, and even require students to login to access the online video.

When your students are finished interacting with your video, you will be able to see results for each student with information about video views and students did on the quizzes.



Anne Mosher, Associate Professor, Geography

As a member of the University Senate’s Committee on Instruction, in 2013-14 I formally reviewed the final report issued by the Vice Chancellor’s “Advancing New Pedagogies Task Force.” The headline messages of that document are clear. First, there is a great deal of ad hoc, in-the-trenches, faculty/instructor-led instructional innovation taking place at SU. We are not laggards. Second, there are several extant university-provided faculty development initiatives intended to make those ad hoc innovations ‘go viral’ on campus (e.g. SITETL—the Summer Institute for Technology Enhanced Teaching and Learning). The problem, the Task Force noted, is that either faculty do not know about the formal initiatives, understand why they might be useful, or see incentives to participate in them. Campus-wide diffusion, therefore, has been slow.

After reflecting on this, the Senate Committee on Instruction further concluded that varying emphasis placed on instructional issues across Schools, Colleges, Departments and Programs has also inhibited diffusion. Units that engage in collective discussion about instruction are more likely to consider new pedagogical models (e.g. active learning) and technologies (e.g. Adobe Connect for classroom flipping) for adoption. They are also more likely to participate in faculty development opportunities, like SITETL. To bring this home a bit, the fact that three out of eighteen participants in SITETL ’14 Session II were from Geography says something about the degree to which instructional effectiveness and ensuring a rich campus-based learning experience matters within our department culture. Instruction is a topic that gets discussed on a frequent basis, informally and formally, particularly around grad student and tenure-track faculty mentoring. We could, however, be talking about it a lot more.

I had a very positive SITETL experience. In a way, it was like being immersed in a living version of the Advancing New Pedagogies Report. Over five days, eighteen faculty (led by eight facilitators from the Office of Academic Affairs, the Online Learning Services Group, and University College):

1) engaged in dialogue about active learning as a pedagogical model,

2) received hand’s-on instruction in various new learning technologies (including, but moving beyond, “clickers”)

3) presented personal summary visions for how to incorporate active learning and digital learning technologies into existing campus-based courses.

I explored two enhancements to my courses. The first is a student peer-review evaluation component for the term-paper project (“Federal-State-Local Partnerships in Infrastructure Provision”) in GEO 313: The United States. It will use the group-work management tool catme.org, the evaluation rubric function in Blackboard, the editing and feedback functions in Google Docs, and the content sharing features of Blackboard. Formalized student peer-review was suggested by students last year who really enjoyed learning about the other term papers being developed in the class during the in-class research/writing workshops I hold. They expressed a desire to play more of a formal feedback role in this process. They also suggested that there might be value in using the term papers as case studies over which they could be tested in the final exam. The facilitators from Online Learning Services helped me see how this might be done using the aforementioned technologies.

The second enhancement is to GEO 491: Senior Seminar in Geography. For the group capstone project this fall, I will have the class learn Expressions (SU’s customized version of WordPress, a website/blogging platform) to create an undergraduate-oriented Geography Department website. The students will be charged with formulating terms of service and use, designing a site map, dividing into working groups, generating content (including video), and devising a plan to keep the website sustainable. This will encourage them to reflect on the discipline as a whole, its role in society, and to see and express to others SU Geography’s uniqueness. It will also allow them to play to their existing talents—as GIS technicians, fieldworkers, writers, political activists—who have specialized in various facets of the field—urban, environmental, GIS, economic, political, historical, etc. Again, the staff at Online Learning Services is poised to help me do the technical training that will make this possible. In the process, the students will be gaining (or applying existing) digital technology skills.

One of the hopes behind SITETL is that each faculty participant will take what they’ve learned back to their departments/units and share it. Jamie Winders, Jane Read, Bob Wilson and I have agreed to make that happen in Geography this coming year. This will be a way to augment ongoing discussions regarding graduate student and faculty development. At the same time, every faculty person should be encouraged to apply and participate in the actual institute. Furthermore, Online Learning Services should be invited to:

  • help us review what we already do in the department with teaching technologies
  • lead brainstorming sessions over what we would like to do instructionally in the future.

This would help us identify key areas of instruction in which digital information technologies could be adopted.

I would like to create an assignment where my students create their own website. How would I do this?

One of the tools that OLS recommends using is a blogging platform called Expressions. Expressions is a service that allows members of the SU Community to build a web site using WordPress.  WordPress is a widely used web publishing tool that is both well documented and supported.  With a SU Expressions WordPress site you can create a portfolio, a class or project blog, or a creative space with the style and content of your choosing. The service offered at SU is free and available to everyone who has a netid and a password. You are not limited in terms of what you upload to your site and you have all the capabilities that WordPress has to offer – including plugins and themes. There are individual expressions sites and there are department expressions sites, depending on your needs. Expressions is supported on campus by ITS and OLS and we offer training for all instructors and will even come into your classroom and show your students how to use expressions as well.

We have found Expressions to be a great tool for those instructors who would like their students to develop an online portfolio or want to give their students an online alternative to writing papers or using Powerpoint.

For more information, click on one of the following below:

Click here to set up your Expressions account

Click here to find more information on Expressions

How can I get immediate feedback from my students in my classroom while keeping them engaged?

For immediate feedback about student understanding, we recommend the use of a student response system. Student response systems allow instructors to ask a question and track immediate responses from students.

Student response systems are often used to:

  • Maintain students’ attention during a lecture
  • Promote active student engagement
  • Promote discussion and collaboration during a class
  • Check for student understanding
  • Teach in a way that adapts to the immediate learning needs of students

At Syracuse University, we support the TurningPoint student response system. TurningPoint allows instructors to:

  • Gauge the comprehension in the classroom
  • Administer a poll
  • Help students review for an upcoming assessment
  • Manage polling participants, content, session data, and generate reports
  • Allow polling from hand-held clickers or web-enabled devices
  • Integrate polling with PowerPoint presentations

Learn more about integrating TurningPoint into your classroom at answers.syr.edu.